USPTO serial 75028451
BIRMINGHAM BULLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 1997
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIRMINGHAM BULLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Birmingham, AL
BIRMINGHAM PROFESSIONAL HOCKEY CLUB, LLC
ATLANTA, GA
Other trademarks owned by BIRMINGHAM PROFESSIONAL HOCKEY CLUB, LLC
Birmingham, AL
Birmingham, AL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHERINE S. CHANG
KATHERINE S CHANG HUNTON & WILLIAMS200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, hats, socks, jerseys, sweaters, T-shirts, shorts, sweatshirts and tanktops; all used in connection with or for the promotion of the sport of hockey | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BHC Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by BIRMINGHAM PROFESSIONAL HOCKEY CLUB, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BHC Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by BHC Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BIRMINGHAM BULLS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |