USPTO serial 75029699
EXCEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXCEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. VICTOR INDIANO
E VICTOR INDIANO BOSE, MCKINNEY AND EVANS2700 FIRST INDIANA PLZ135 N PENNSYLVANIA STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | trade show and convention support services, namely providing decorating services for trade shows and conventions, providing rental furnishings to exhibitors, providing booth setup and breakdown services for exhibitors, receiving and shipping displays for exhibitors at trade shows and conventions, and providing an electronic, computer accessible presence for exhibitors at conventions and trade shows | ABANDONED | Aug 31, 1967 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |