Drawing for INABLE

USPTO serial 75035112

INABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H. Tannenbaum

DAVID H TANNENBAUM FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI2200 ROSS AVESTE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009interactive voice response computer softwareABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 3, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 22, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 17, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance