Drawing for SCOTIABANK.CA

USPTO serial 75035673

SCOTIABANK.CA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARMINE, F. D.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCOTIABANK.CA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI

LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIE1 PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035on-line information services in the field of economic forecasting and analysis; on-line dissemination of advertising information for others in the field of banking services, securities services, trust and fiduciary services, and insurance servicesACTIVE—
036on-line information services in the field of banking services, trust and fiduciary services and insurance services; and the providing of banking services, including on-line transactional services, agency services in the field of bonds and other securities, automated securities brokerage, financial investment services in the field of securities, mortgaging of securities for others, estate trust management services, fiduciary representative services and the providing of life, accident, automobile, fire, property, marine and medical insuranceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 18, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 24, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 10, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 23, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 25, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 25, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 26, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance