USPTO serial 75036086
LAMAZE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY EDUCATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAMAZE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY EDUCATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK J. COYNE
PATRICK J COYNE COLLIER, SHANNON, RILL & SCOTT3050 K ST N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | baby bath products, baby hygiene products and other products related to babies | ACTIVE | Nov 17, 1997 |
| 010 | baby nursing aids, nursing aids for mothers, baby health care products and other products relating to baby care | ACTIVE | Nov 17, 1997 |
| 016 | printed publications relating to maternity, babies, children, health and family | ACTIVE | Nov 17, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lamaze Publishing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named LAMAZE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY EDUCATION
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |