USPTO serial 75036579
ATN ONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, DOMINIC
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATN ONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Grow
MICHAEL A GROW VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE1828 L ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | cellular telephone services; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; electronic mail services; electronic store-and-forward messaging; paging services; data and voice telecommunications | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely providing on-line computer services and access thereto; providing access to and interface with computer networks, bulletin boards, and databases; computer consultation, research, programming, and software design services; and providing data network services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |