USPTO serial 75037049
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
6150 CANNES LA BOCCA, MC
6150 CANNES LA BOCCA, MC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. PATCH
Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | dolls, doll clothing, playsets for dolls, doll houses, not including stuffed toy animals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |