Drawing for THE STAINLESS STEEL RAT

USPTO serial 75037885

THE STAINLESS STEEL RAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE STAINLESS STEEL RAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

I. MORLEY DRUCKER

I MORLEY DRUCKER FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLP10877 WILSHIRE BLVD TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016posters, series of fiction and non-fiction books featuring comics, subjects concerning music, namely, musical instruments, sheet music, musicians, music trivia, current events relating to music, musician biographies, music composition, music production and distribution, live concerts and performances, music history, entertainment and educational issues, children's activity books, coloring books, books of general interest, namely, appointment books, baby books, children's books, cook books, engagement books, exercise books, log books, picture books, prayer books, recipe books, score books, sketch books, song books, and guide books, bumper stickers, stickers, calendars, pencil sharpeners, pencil cases, 3-ring binders, notebooks, stationery consisting of writing paper and envelopes, memo pads, writing tablets, paper table cloths, paper napkins, pencils, erasers, coloring books, writing pens, non-calibrated rules, paper weights, paper coasters, and paper matsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 22, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 7, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 14, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance