USPTO serial 75039331
LA GAIA OUR MOTHER OUR EARTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA GAIA OUR MOTHER OUR EARTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Carlton, Victoria 3053, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William W. DeWitt
WILLIAM W DEWITT PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTON695 KENMOOR SEP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | personal soaps; facial soap bars; hair shampoos; hair conditioners; non-medicated hair treatments; hair styling gels; herbal hair colors, facial cleaning preparations; cleansing masks; skin freshening preparations; facial moisturizers; non-medicated skin treatments; lip care products, namely, non-medicated lip balm; body lotions; massage oils; bath/shower lotions and salts; natural perfume oils; essential oils for personal use; and perfumes | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | personal care and body cleaning products, namely, body cleaning sponges, including loofah sponges, combs and hair brushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |