Drawing for OLIVETTI ENVISION

USPTO serial 75039580

OLIVETTI ENVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLIVETTI ENVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy A. French

TIMOTHY A FRENCH FISH & RICHARDSON PC225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computers; personal and portable computers; keyboards for computers; electrical power supplies; computer disk drives; blank streaming tapes; apparatus for reading and recording data on magnetic and optical supports, namely, blank magnetically encoded and optical cards and discs, boards and cards having microprocessors, readers and recorders for said boards and cards; devices for reproduction of sound and images, namely, video controllers, fax/modem boardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 18, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 18, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 27, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 5, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 14, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance