Drawing for RELATIONAL CYTOPATHOLOGY REVIEW GUIDE

USPTO serial 75039855

RELATIONAL CYTOPATHOLOGY REVIEW GUIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELATIONAL CYTOPATHOLOGY REVIEW GUIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley J. Hulbert

BRADLEY J HULBERT MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF300 S WACKER DR STE 700CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for use in a comparative imaging analysis system for use in screening and review of cytopathology specimens, and identification of the cells in the specimens being reviewedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 25, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 17, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 15, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 25, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 25, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance