USPTO serial 75040174
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger H. Bora
Roger H. Bora Thompson Hine LLP10050 Innovation DriveSuite 400Dayton, OH 45342| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | [ radio communication services for aircraft navigation; satellite and electronic transmission of messages and data for aircraft navigation; operation of communications facilities and networks for aircraft navigation ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1996 |
| 039 | [ air traffic control and aircraft navigation services; namely, aircraft navigation information services; ] flight information services; providing information to third parties regarding air travel and air traffic navigation and control by means of a global computer information network; on-line services, namely, providing information to third parties regarding air travel and air traffic navigation and control [ operation of air traffic centers, terminal control units and control towers; operation of facilities for aircraft navigation and automated flight data recording and display systems ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1996 |
| 041 | [ educational and training services relating to air navigation, aeronautics and air traffic control, namely, providing classes, courses, workshops, seminars, conferences, demonstrations, computer-based training and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1996 |
| 042 | [ operating facilities for surveillance and radar detection of aircraft; establishing and promoting operational efficiency and safety of air navigation and air traffic control, namely, reviewing standards and practices of air navigation and air traffic control to assure operational efficiency and compliance with safety laws and regulations and support services related to safe aircraft operations in the nature of technical supervision, inspection and consulting relating thereto; technical consulting and research and development services in the field of air navigation and air traffic control systems; emergency assistance relating to air traffic control, namely, providing emergency air traffic consultation, arranging for the dispatch of emergency vehicles and staff and monitoring and notifying emergency and medical facilities; ] aviation weather reporting and forecasting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |