Drawing for NATIONAL DRUNK DRIVING DEFENSE TASK FORCE

USPTO serial 75040205

NATIONAL DRUNK DRIVING DEFENSE TASK FORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2285763Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 12, 1999
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with NATIONAL DRUNK DRIVING DEFENSE TASK FORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey Briggs

Jeffrey Briggs Briggs Law6464 Sunset BlvdSuite 715Hollywood, CA 90028

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing information and means of communication to attorneys in the field of drunk driving defense by way of a national and/or global computer information networkSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 12, 2018REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jun 5, 2017EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2017PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Jan 23, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 10, 2016ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2008RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Nov 21, 200889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 19, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 11, 2008E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 23, 2005C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 23, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jun 9, 2005815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 9, 2005E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 19, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 1999R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 18, 1999CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 22, 1999REINREINSTATED—
May 17, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 1997SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 9, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 13, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 9, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 16, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 19, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance