Drawing for FLOPAM

USPTO serial 75040415

FLOPAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SARAI, BALDEV
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLOPAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL P. WILLIAMS

MICHAEL P WILLIAMS WALL MARJAMA & BILINSKI217 MONTGOMERY STHILLS BLDG - 7TH FLSYRACUSE, NY 13202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001flocculent chemicals used in the recovery of oil-- thereforABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 1997ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 1997ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 15, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 9, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 28, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance