Drawing for ROOKIE COOK

USPTO serial 75040429

ROOKIE COOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROOKIE COOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John R. Benefiel

JOHN R BENEFIEL280 DAINES STSTE 100 BBIRMINGHAM, MI 48009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008tableware, namely, spoons, and kitchen cutting tools, namely, pumpkin carving sets, including a carving blade, a scoop, a crayon and a candle, pizza cutters, manually-operated food choppersACTIVE—
021stockpots, steamers, frypans, woks, omelette pans, rice cookers, loaf pans, mixing bowls, gelatin molds, candy molds, colanders, trivets, frozen confection molds, canape makers comprised of finger sandwich cutters; dough presses, food cutting boards, plastic pastry mats and pastry cloths for rolling dough on; biscuit cutters, terra cotta pancake and tortilla warmers, cookie cutters, spatulas, graters, plastic food storage containers, pizza pans, cake pans, pie pans, muffin pans, cookie sheets, cooling racks, scoops, ice cream dishes, whisks, basting brushes, cake decorating tips, jar openers, cake icing combs, mesh strainers, skewers, carafes, shakers (seasonings), salad spinners, kitchen ladles, gravy separators, serving pitchers, syrup dispensers, egg rings, rolling pinsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 19, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 8, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 14, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 10, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance