Drawing for BRAIN MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 75040690

BRAIN MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAIN MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce E. Hayden

BRUCE E HAYDEN BRUCE E HAYDEN, PC7604 VAIL VALLEY DRAUSTIN, TX 78749UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely conducting seminars in the field of self-improvement through subliminal learning techniquesABANDONEDOct 15, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 1998PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 27, 1998PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 1998PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Sep 22, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 20, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance