USPTO serial 75041037
BROADBAND CODE DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2637506Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BROADBAND CODE DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald B. Halt, Jr.
GERALD B HALT JR VOLPE AND KOENIG, PC400 ONE PENN CTR1617 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVDPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless telecommunications equipment, namely, radiotelephones, radio modulators and demodulators; radio correlators; synchronization units for wireless digital communication; radiotelephone accessories, namely, batteries, microphones, and loudspeakers; and wireless digital radio communication systems comprising base stations, radio transmitters, radio receivers, switches, handsets, antennas, wiring, computer processors, and computer subscriber stations, and software for operating the foregoing equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 13, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by InterDigital Communications Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by InterDigital Communications Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BROADBAND CODE DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |