USPTO serial 75041560
CADVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARMINE, F. D.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CADVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kent A. Herink
KENT A HERINK DAVIS, BROWN, KOEHN, SHORS & ROBERTS, PCTHE FINANCIAL CTR666 WALNUT ST STE 2500DES MOINES, IA 50309-3993Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in association with computer animation and rendering programs in generating and manipulating images from computer-aided-design files | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 24, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 24, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |