USPTO serial 75041630
Serial No. 75041630
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75041630?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 1L4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth M. Garrett
KENNETH M GARRETT1033 BAY ST STE 308TORONTO, ON M5S 3A5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit juices, non-alcoholic fruit-flavoured and fruit-based soft drinks; soft drinks with tea flavours; natural spring water; demineralized drinking water; flavoured drinking water; sparkling drinking water including sparkling flavoured drinking water; non-alcoholic sports beverages, namely, isotonic drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |