Drawing for WILD WATERS

USPTO serial 75041823

WILD WATERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILD WATERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Dalton Baril

MARY DALTON BARIL MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, LLPONE JAMES CTR901 E CARY STRICHMOND, VA 23219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041amusement parks; recreation services in the nature of water slides, swimming pools, a beach, volleyball courts, playgrounds, floating docks and picnic groundsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 30, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 5, 1997CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 31, 1997DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 2, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance