USPTO serial 75042234
SCIENTIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLOGEORGIS, GEORGE C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCIENTIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MS MARTY W RAHFUSE
MS MARTY W RAHFUSE TRISTAR CORPORATION12500 SAN PEDRO AVE STE 500SAN ANTONIO, TX 78216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bath gel, bath oil, body oil, essential oils for personal use, bath powder, face powder, body powder, beauty mask, blusher, eye creme, skin emollients, skin lotion, toilet water, perfume, cologne, cologne eau de toilette, vanishing cream, wrinkle-removing skin care preparations, personal deodorants, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, eye pencil, eye shadow, eyebrow pencils, eyeliners, mascara, compacts, facial makeup, foundation makeup, rouge, lip gloss, nail grooming products, namely, nail enamel, nail hardener, nail polish, nail base coat, and nail polish remover, non-medicated hair care preparations, non-medicated lip balm, lip gloss, and lipstick | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |