Drawing for DENVER DAREDEVILS

USPTO serial 75042778

DENVER DAREDEVILS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENVER DAREDEVILS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLEY S CRAIG

LESLEY S CRAIG TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, T-shirtsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 1999ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 31, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 1998IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 31, 1998AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 12, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 9, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance