USPTO serial 75042781
LEROUX POLISH POPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEROUX POLISH POPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine H. Stockel
CATHERINE H STOCKEL PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JIM BEAM BRANDS CO.
- Other trademarks owned by JIM BEAM BRANDS CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named LEROUX POLISH POPPER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |