USPTO serial 75043116
GOLDWELL INTELLIGENT CARE FOR HAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HORRALL, PATRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLDWELL INTELLIGENT CARE FOR HAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tracy A. Bacigalupo
TRACY A BACIGALUPO BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL300 E LOMBARD ST 19TH FLBALTIMORE, MD 21202-3268UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care products, namely shampoos, conditioners, finishing rinses, mousses, styling lotions, styling gels, hair sprays, hair tonics, hair packs, hair fixing and setting lotions and sprays, non-medicated hair-regenerating compositions, hair-growth promoters, hair dyeing and tinting preparations, semi-permanent hair coloring preparations, hair bleaching preparations, permanent wave lotions and neutralizers, hair coloring systems, highlighting and streaking systems, perming systems and hair reconstruction systems | ABANDONED | Nov 27, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |