Drawing for HEALTHY CHOICE LUNCH COMBOS

USPTO serial 75043656

HEALTHY CHOICE LUNCH COMBOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WARD, JOYCE A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY CHOICE LUNCH COMBOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick C. Stephenson

PATRICK C STEPHENSONMCGRATH, N MULLIN & KRATZ, PC1400 ONE CENTRAL PARK PLZOMAHA, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029packaged meal combinations consisting primarily of pasta salads with meat and salad dressings in combination with breads and desserts, packaged meal combinations consisting primarily of mealt salads with relishes and salsas in combination with breads and dessert, and packaged meal combinations consisting primarily of soups in combination with breads and dessertsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 31, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance