USPTO serial 75044182
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES S MURRAY
CHARLES S MURRAY JR DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY LLP2101 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software used for the development of web sites | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |