USPTO serial 75044431
MARINE CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARINE CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing an on-line computer database via the global computer information network and electronic bulletin board featuring advertisement and marketing information for others about marine-related recreational goods and services; and on-line ordering services featuring marine-related recreational goods and services | ABANDONED | May 22, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 1998 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |