Drawing for LESCONCIERGES

USPTO serial 75044642

LESCONCIERGES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LESCONCIERGES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter K. Hahn

PETER K HAHN600 W BROADWAYSTE 2600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039making reservations and bookings for transportation for othersACTIVE—
041party and special event planning and arranging for ticket reservations for shows and other entertainment eventsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 4, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 18, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 11, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 13, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 15, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance