USPTO serial 75044812
COMPUTERPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMPUTERPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Bruce Hamburg
C BRUCE HAMBURG JORDAN AND HAMBURGCHANIN BLDG122 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10168Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | broadcast network, namely, circuit modules and/or containers containing circuit modules that interface with a network for carrying digital signals to be transmitted to a group of terminals; and computer software which controls the circuit modules and/or which causes creation of digital signals that pass through the circuit modules for controlling circuit modules and/or terminals connected to the network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Operating a broadcast network serving as a transmission path for digital signals supplied by others to a group of terminals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |