USPTO serial 75044907
DIRECT DIGITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRECT DIGITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Morrison
THOMAS R MORRISON THE MORRISON LAW FIRM145 N FIFTH AVEMOUNT VERNON, NY 10550UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic still camera; video camera; 35 mm still cameras; other photographic apparatus and instruments, namely, CCD Cameras, lenses; floppy disk drive; CD-ROM drive; printer image scanners; facsimile machines; portable image copiers; video projectors; camcorder; electronic machines and instruments, namely, word processors and computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |