USPTO serial 75044962
SPEED STIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEED STIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jayne Conway Hunter
J SCOTT EVANS ADAMS LAW FIRM PA2180 TWO FIRST UNION PLZ310 S TRYONCHARLOTTE, NC 28282Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | baseball bat used for training, consisting of a light bat with a padded tip | ABANDONED | Jan 18, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |