USPTO serial 75045411
CLONE CLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWE, ROBERT J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLONE CLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD W. SEED
RICHARD W SEED SEED AND BERRY6300 COLUMBIA CTRSEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers and computer hardware for use in the wireless communication field; wireless communication components to facilitate management and operation of wireless communication systems; wireless communication components to facilitate wireless communication call security; computer programs for management and operation of wireless communication systems; computer programs for management and operation of wireless communication systems and program user manuals sold as a unit therewith; computer programs used to facilitate wireless communication call security; and computer programs used to facilitate wireless communication call security and program user manuals sold as a unit therewith | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | wireless communication system maintenance and support services; wireless communication system call security services; and wireless communication system management and operation services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |