USPTO serial 75045569
ULTIMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTIMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. A. Ryan
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC P O BOX 1995150 ALLEN RDSTE 2000LIBERTY CORNER, NJ 07938-1995Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications products, namely outside plant structured cabling system consisting of copper, coaxial and fiber optic cable, cabinets, enclosures, cable connectors, composite cable and cable connectors, central office cable terminating devices, and telecommunications network interface devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |