Drawing for CURRIER & IVES

USPTO serial 75046656

CURRIER & IVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANOK, DAWNMARIE DISTEFANO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CURRIER & IVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Baila H. Celedonia

BAILA H CELEDONIA COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021porcelain plates, cups, statues, bowls, candlesticks, vases; earthenware statues, candlesticks, baskets, serving platters, cups, vases, bowls; glassware, namely, drinking glasses, tumblers and beverage stemware, pitchers, vases, candleholders, candlesticks, bowls, baskets, serving platters, bottles sold empty, porcelain jars for jams and jellies; non-metal decorative boxes; busts, statuettes and figures made of china, earthenware, glass, terracotta, porcelain and crystal; ornaments made of china, earthenware, glass, porcelain, crystal, and terracotta; decorative plates; decanters; napkin rings not of precious metals; serving spoons; candle snuffers not of precious metal; soap dishes; stained glass decorations; salt and pepper shakers; mugs; cruets, not of precious metals; wind chimes; perfume atomizers, sold empty; trivetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 23, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 31, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 24, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 14, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 9, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 8, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 30, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance