USPTO serial 75047197
SELECT BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 1998
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SELECT BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Select Brand Distributors, Inc.
Pine Bluff, AR
Select Brand Distributors, Inc.
Pine Bluff, AR
STEPHEN LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC.
PINE BLUFF, AR
Select Brand Distributors, Inc.
Pine Bluff, AR
Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc.
Pine Bluff, AR
Other trademarks owned by Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Burlingame
ROBERT B BURLINGAME CALENDAR/DOCKETING DEPTPILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPPO BOX 7880SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7880Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bathroom cleaner, oven cleaner, and rug cleaner | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Select Brand Distributors, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Select Brand Distributors, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by STEPHEN LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Select Brand Distributors, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SELECT BRAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 16, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |