USPTO serial 75047275
CUBA CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CUBA CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Miami Beach, FL
Miami Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE J. LOTT
LESLIE J LOTT P O DRAWER 141098LOTT & FRIEDLAND, PACORAL GABLES, FL 33114-1098UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cuba Club, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cuba Club, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named CUBA CLUB
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |