USPTO serial 75047771
WEBWATCHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBWATCHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Caravelle Networks Corporation
Nepean, Ontario K2E 7L5
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Todd Plaskacz
R TODD PLASKACZ PLASKACZ & ASSOCIATESELGAR LAW OFFICE200 ELGIN ST STE 805OTTAWA, ON K2P 1L5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software programs for monitoring network devices and applications on a global computer network together with instructions in both electronic and paper format sold therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | Nov 18, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |