USPTO serial 75047968
TRANSPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZERVAS, ALBERT JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRANSPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Levy
STEVEN M LEVY PROSKAUER ROSE GOETZ & MENDELSOHN LLP1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036-8299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing multiple-use access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information and computer services, namely, leasing access time to an on-line interactive computer database in a wide variety of fields | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1998 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |