USPTO serial 75049012
NETPATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETPATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B HARRISON
MARK B HARRISON SPENCER & FRANKSTE 300 E1100 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications equipment, namely, a series of digital multiplexers and network access devices used to support and manage data, voice and images | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 28, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |