USPTO serial 75049193
INTERNET COMPUTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERNET COMPUTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER S. SLOANE
ALEXANDRIA NICHOLSON DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1740 BROADWAY 25TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing information on a global computer network in the fields of on-line marketing, advertising and business, including providing marketing statistics, and marketing and advertising trends | ACTIVE | Apr 11, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZD INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZD INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff-Davis Publishing Company
- Other trademarks owned by ZIFF-DAVIS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named INTERNET COMPUTING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |