Drawing for CLASSIC CAFE BEST BURGERS IN TOWN

USPTO serial 75049507

CLASSIC CAFE BEST BURGERS IN TOWN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUTHEY, LYNN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASSIC CAFE BEST BURGERS IN TOWN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald R. Boss

GERALD R BOSSPOST OFFICE BOX 10827GREENVILLE, SC 29603-0827UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant servicesABANDONEDDec 25, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 1998ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 1997ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance