Drawing for CHA CHA IN CARUMBA

USPTO serial 75049878

CHA CHA IN CARUMBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHA CHA IN CARUMBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LETICIA TREY VILLEGAS

LETICIA TREY VILLEGAS CHA CHA IN CARUMBA INC44 MONTGOMERY ST STE 500SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, T-shirts, hats, caps, jackets, coats, pajamas, shoes, pants, shirts, underwear, sweaters, belts, costumes, dresses, socks, gloves, neckties, skirts and shortsACTIVE—
028computer games, namely, interactive video games comprised of computer hardware and software, computer game software hand held unit for playing electronic game, computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely, discs, computer game programs and cartridges, and toys, namely, dolls, action figures, cars, electrical and mechanical action toys, plush toys, balls, banks, bath toys, doll and action figure clothing and accessories, board games, action skill games, card games, kites, jigsaw and manipulative puzzles and yo-yo'sACTIVE—
041online computer services, namely, entertainment services in the nature of providing online, interactive computer games; providing a Web site presenting computer programs, audiovisual works and other works of others; providing a Web site in the field of entertainmentACTIVE—
042on-line computer services, namely, providing facilities for real time interaction with other computer users concerning topics of general interest, namely, chat rooms, electronic bulletin board services, in the fields of clothing, computer programs, toys, games, entertainment, news, and audiovisual worksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2000EX1MSOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
May 18, 2000EX1DSOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Aug 24, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 23, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 23, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 1, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 23, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance