USPTO serial 75049934
SCRUNGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLOGEORGIS, GEORGE C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCRUNGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Midlands DY9 8HG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B. LASKY
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT & GOULD3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations, soaps (not for personal use); disinfectants, detergents | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | instruments and materials for cleaning purposes; utensils and containers, buckets, buckets incorporating mop wringers and buckets incorporating castors; dusters, mops, mop heads, mop holders; window and floor wipers and scrapers; carpet sweepers, floor sweepers (not being machines), brooms; scouring pads, scrubbing brushes; bottles, bottles incorporating spraying apparatus (not being machines); dust bins, refuse bins, waste paper bins; litter and waste scoops; sponges (other than surgical sponges), sponge holders and sponge wringers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |