USPTO serial 75050664
SKYWEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKYWEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. BROWN
MICHAEL O'MALLEY1444 STUART STDENVER, CO 80204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for providing access to a global computer network | ABANDONED | Apr 13, 1995 |
| 035 | advertising and marketing the goods and services of others via a global computer network | ABANDONED | Apr 13, 1995 |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing on-line facilities for hosting the web pages of others; preparing, maintaining and managing the web pages of others; and computer consulting services | ABANDONED | Apr 13, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |