USPTO serial 75051028
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
44866 Bochum, DE
44866 Bochum, DE
44866 Bochum, DE
STATUS PRO MASCHINENMESSTECHNIK GMBH
BOCHUM, DE
Other trademarks owned by STATUS PRO MASCHINENMESSTECHNIK GMBH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
KAREN M KITTERMAN FENWICK & W LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Engineering services; measuring calibration; measurement evaluations and diagnoses in the field of machinery, especially the examination and diagnosis of machines for the early identification of faults and/or wear; and consultation in the field of machinery repair | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |