USPTO serial 75051527
C/S-TEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C/S-TEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST SIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in the field of database design and administration, programming, system administration and application software development, testing and debugging in standalone, distributed networking and client/server environments, and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | Feb 7, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |