USPTO serial 75051690
GLOBAL OFFICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOBAL OFFICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH E KOVARIK
JOSEPH E KOVARIK SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer systems comprising telephone computer hardware and software used to provide international telphone calling card access, storage and transmission of messages by telephone and the world wide computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | telephone calling card services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | communication services access card services, namely, voice messaging services, electronic mail services, paging services, fax services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Executive Telecard, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Executive Telecard, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named GLOBAL OFFICE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |