Drawing for MINT JULEP

USPTO serial 75051694

MINT JULEP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MINT JULEP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven C. Schnedler

STEVEN C SCHNEDLER CARTER & SCHNEDLER, PA56 CENTRAL AVE #103P O BOX 2985ASHEVILLE, NC 28802

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029apple sauce; canned fruits; cheese fondue; chocolate milk; conserves; cranberry sauce; cream cheese; cream; crystallized fruit; cut fruits; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen dairy-based chocolate food beverages; dairy-based dips; dairy-based food beverages; dips; dried fruits; egg nog; egg nog mixes; flavored whey-based food beverage; fruit chips; frozen fruits; fruit paste; fruit pectin; fruit peels; fruit preserves; fruit pulp; fruit rinds; fruit salads; fruit sauces; fruit topping; fruit-based fillings for cakes and pies; fruit-based snack food; fruit-based spreads; fruits preserved in alcohol; garden salads; half and half; jams; jellies; lemon curd; maraschino cherries; marmalade; margarine; margarine substitutes; meat jellies; mincemeat; non-dairy creamer; nut topping; pickled watermelon rind; pickled vegetables; pickles; preserved fruits; processed dates; processed peaches; processed peels; processed peppers; raisins; salad dressing; sliced fruits; snack dips; snack food dips; souffles; soy-based beverage used as a milk substitute; soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; unflavored and unsweetened gelatins; vegetable-based chocolate food beverages; vegetable-based food beverages; whey-based food beverage; whipping cream; whipped creamABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 10, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance