USPTO serial 75053053
GLOBUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VLCEK, TOMAS V
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GLOBUS CELLULAR & USER PROTECTION LTD.
Kelowna, British Columbia V1Y 4R5, CA
Other trademarks owned by GLOBUS CELLULAR & USER PROTECTION LTD.
GLOBUS CELLULAR & USER PROTECTION LTD.
Kelowna, British Columbia V1Y 4R5, CA
Other trademarks owned by GLOBUS CELLULAR & USER PROTECTION LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK M. YANG
MARK M YANG CLARK, WILSONV6C 3H1 CANADA800-885 W GEORGIA STVANCOUVER, BC V6C 3H1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals for use in developing X-ray and photographic film | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 1995 |
| 009 | cellular phone safety products, namely, reduced radiation high performance antennas, and shields; cellular phones, cellular phone holders; cellular phone cases; hands-free car kits comprising mounting brackets and hardware, phone hand sets, antennas, casings and wiring for cellular phones; digital and analog cellular antennas; and cellular phone accessories, namely, battery packs, battery chargers, battery savers, battery pack eliminators, quick charges, plug-in battery savers and chargers; nickel cadmium battery packs and metal and hydride battery packs, X-ray safety and protective clothing and shields, namely, thyroid collars, gonad shields, gondala shields and belt system; lead blockers, lead gloves, lead aprons, lead sleeves, spinal stoles, panties, lead vests, lead shirts; X-ray safety and protective shields for protecting equipment, namely, lead apron rakes and hangers, video display terminal aprons, lead vinyl sheeting, lead pillows and protective covers for shielding computer equipment; safety glasses and goggles; X-ray film processing; and X-ray badges for measuring radiation exposure; X-ray film carrying cases, film storage bins, cases and cabinets | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 1995 |
| 010 | X-ray apparatus for medical use | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBUS CELLULAR & USER PROTECTION LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBUS CELLULAR & USER PROTECTION LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named GLOBUS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |