Drawing for AOPA

USPTO serial 75053377

AOPA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AOPA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel B. Hassett

DANIEL B HASSETT GALLAND, KHARASCH, MORSE & GARFINKLE, PC1054 THIRTY-FIRST ST N WSTE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042association services, namely, promoting and improving the economic and professional climate of professionals in the field of orthotic and prosthetic technologyABANDONEDJun 30, 1967

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 1998ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 1997ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 13, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 11, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance